If your personal benefit of the horse armor in Oblivion doesn't outweigh the $5 cost then don't buy it - but don't come on here like saltboy whining that we need to whip the software companies into shape because they owe us something. Why shouldn't a software company look to cover its costs (and XBL costs) when releasing content devised after the game was released?Value is the sum (or difference) of two things - the benefit that it provides and the personal cost. I'm sure enough of us on Ars work for software companies and know that the release process is not cheap - even for the tiniest parts.

Any enhancement done after the release, whether its a new tree color or a new pack of quests requires development.

If you bothered to read what saltboy said, he was specifically talking about DLC that adds a new skin, model or some minor feature rather than adding hours of new content.Oblivion is not a minor feature added to Morrowind, but I guess you'd rather knock down a strawman. BASTARDS! If you'll pay $15 for horse armor, then you are a fool. In fact, I shouldn't have even bought Oblivion - they should have had all that content with Morrowind. It's all just an elaborate ploy to personally screw me out of fifteen whole U.S. Quote:Originally posted by wjousts:quote:Originally posted by JabberWockey:You're right saltboy.I shouldn't encourage developers to continue making content after the initial release.

Oblivion dlcs prices